Expose more losers!
Send examples to badloserwallofshame@gmail.com
Intro
It's happened to all of us.To be having fun playing an online game, only to have it abruptly ended by a poor loser who would rather rage-quit on you than finish with some dignity.
I set up this blog to expose those people, and probably get some laughs out of post-loss hate mail.I will be posting mostly from experience with Street Fighter 4 on the Playstation Network, but I will accept submissions from all games and platforms.
I set up this blog to expose those people, and probably get some laughs out of post-loss hate mail.I will be posting mostly from experience with Street Fighter 4 on the Playstation Network, but I will accept submissions from all games and platforms.
Rules
1. Pictures of offenders is required for proof.
2. Acceptable proof of poor losers can be disconnects, hatemail etc.
3. To qualify as a disconnecting, the loser must pull from the match at an unreasonable time such as right before taking a loss. Everyone gets randomly disconnected at one time or another, please take this into account.
2. Acceptable proof of poor losers can be disconnects, hatemail etc.
3. To qualify as a disconnecting, the loser must pull from the match at an unreasonable time such as right before taking a loss. Everyone gets randomly disconnected at one time or another, please take this into account.
21 comments:
July 1, 2009 at 4:13 PM
Two scrubs as bad as each other. One Flowchart Ken and a chickenshit Chun Li who does nothing but hold, let alone any BnB's.
No class on either side there, sorry :)
July 1, 2009 at 11:19 PM
No offense taken. I don't claim to be an expert player, so I certainly hope that I don't give the impression that I'm trying to act like one.
That said, I'm a little confused at your response. I suppose that I could have tore into him, but I thought that I was pretty clear that I wasn't taking the fight seriously and was focusing on just throwing the guy. I even said "I'm going'ta see if I can just throw him".
So no, there's nothing fancy going on here. I didn't intend there to be. The guy was too ridiculous with his jumping and DPs, so I was being deliberately simplistic in return... and beating him soundly.
July 2, 2009 at 12:27 AM
It clearly is a player match, the Ken player sucked, the Chun-Li clearly sucked as well (zero evidence of being good - doing bugger all, almost no combo's of note). The Chun-Li player started taunting as if he was actually trying to show his authority or something, the ken player wanted to play the game to the best of his ability (which may be very low level), and was sick of some guy trying to act the big man as if he was good (taunting) - so the Ken quit. If you want to taunt and act all big (or even just play people who aren't 100% noobs who know nothing), you maybe should play Championship mode - this is where anyone who is any good is at, player matches are for the nobodies who susk 100%, or for private games amongst friends/adversaries.
This is quite a pathetic video all round, if you want a decent game, stop making random player matches and accepting every idiot who joins, play championship mode where at least a win means something. The ken sucked and shouldn't have quit, but he left and you lost nothing other than a game you yourself were clearly not taking seriously - barely a video worth posting.
July 2, 2009 at 1:46 AM
Wow, a guy posts a video about a ragequitter on a site ridiculing ragequitters -- and he's the one being ridiculed. If you guys want expert level matches, scour Youtube and SRK, because not everyone who exposes ragequitters are SF4 professionals.
The guy even said he didn't take the game seriously and was just having fun -- you know, "fun," the reason we play games in the first place. Once again, you don't have to be a Street Fighter pro to enjoy playing the game. I'm all for finding good competition (beating textbook flowchart Kens get boring, for example), but sometimes I wonder who's worse: the ragequit attitude online or the holier-than-thou attitude some posters show on here like their game is untouchable.
July 2, 2009 at 5:45 AM
Anon, I never said my game is untouchable, in fact it's average to reasonable at best. But I do have a few more moves than just holding people for the sheer sake of it. Even someone using the sheer basics of Chun Li could have beat this Flowchart much quicker, without holding every 5 seconds. Laugh at a ragequitter by all means, but at least do show a little bravado...:)
July 2, 2009 at 9:39 AM
I have to say, I don't think I have posted a video yet where someone doesn't comment about how the winning player is a scrub/sucks/cheap/turtle
These are ragequit videos not combo exhibitions.
July 4, 2009 at 8:55 PM
No u must do all hard trials 3x each during the course of the match for your ragequit video to be taken seriously its the law. Well if its not people seem to make it sound like it is with all the bashing they do of people who block, throw, or throw out a special that gets blocked.
July 5, 2009 at 12:01 AM
I think it is fair to even question whether this was a "RAGE quit". The Ken probably just felt the Chun was wasting his time, which is true. The Ken was trying at least, the Chun Li player was being a d*ck, taunting and what not, so the Ken left. It was a player match, nothing was lost, and the Chun Li player deserved it. The only valid reason to taunt (other than annoying your opponent or trying to look good as if you actually are dominating), is to stop camping etc or to make a player come forward losing a charge, this Chun-Li player was taunting for no reason other than being a d*ck - he thought he was much better than the Ken and was using taunts to try take the p*ss. The truth of the matter is the Chun-Li player sucked just as much as the Ken, and the Ken player got the last laugh.
The excuse the Chun Li was playing for 'fun' etc is a joke, no-one videos games when they are messing about, together with the fact that posting a video on a rage quit site alone suggests the Chun Li player was taking this a bit more serious than a messing about game.
July 5, 2009 at 11:01 PM
The ken was trying? You could have fooled me. All I saw was jump in and flaming SRK and a couple sweeps. The chun player didn't have to do anything but stay on the ground, block and toss him. Why go for any extra effort if that is actually working?
Yes it looked like a ragequit as well.
July 5, 2009 at 11:59 PM
I am somewhat surprised - though I suppose that I shouldn't be - that there are a few here who seem to be angry that I didn't show off during the match. Anyway, if you don't see the humor in this then I suppose that we simply have a different sense of humor.
This was not a player match, this was a Ranked match. Feel free to click through to the YouTube page for more information.
July 6, 2009 at 12:00 PM
Personally I don't care how much effort people put into playing. This site is about exposing ragequitters and poor loosers in general. What the chun player did worked, the ken player got ticked and ragequit.
I was responding to the person above me in my earlier post more or less.
July 6, 2009 at 11:58 PM
Wow, those are some pretty huge failures up there. I submit that these holier-than-thou people are, in fact, more annoying than the ragequitters. Destroyers of all things good and fun!
NO, clearly the Chun Li player has disgraced the Ken player's family and fellow countrymen and sapped them of all their integrity and honor. How dare he use the taunt feature so recklessly. This is SLANDER, sir. SLANDER! Street Fighter is serious business, bro. There is nothing lighthearted about vidya gaims. NOTHING.
July 7, 2009 at 12:54 AM
Wow, the people who are ridiculing the Chun-Li player are very fail indeed. Way to miss the point.
July 14, 2009 at 8:50 AM
Yeah the taunting was no needed, its a player match againts some obvious noob. If you meet someome that just sucks beat the crap out of him and move on to another match, no need to humillate him.
This would be a laught in a rank or tourney match, don't blame him for not wanting to be your toy.
July 18, 2009 at 12:40 AM
lol guys, taunting is part of the game.
Punish it? Or is taunting as cheap as spamming hadokens or zoning?
August 1, 2009 at 5:22 PM
What's wrong with Chun's game? That's how you beat flowchart Kens with the least effort. It's how I beat every flowchart ken I saw back in G1. If it ain't broke don't fix it. Why put more effort into a win if you don't have to?
August 17, 2009 at 9:04 PM
Everyone who ridicules the Chun Li player is seriously fucking stupid. Street Fighter is a game, and there are ways to win and lose a game. Blocking and throwing is a way to win, jumping and fierce punch SRK all over the screen is not.
To the Chun Li player:
I liked the taunts. Keep it up. He won't try stupid shit like that next time.
August 22, 2009 at 1:36 PM
@Anonymous
"Wow, a guy posts a video about a ragequitter on a site ridiculing ragequitters -- and he's the one being ridiculed. If you guys want expert level matches, scour Youtube and SRK, because not everyone who exposes ragequitters are SF4 professionals."
Amen! What a bunch of fucking tools that are posting comments! The guy playing Chun Li never said that he was a EXPERT (like all you other fucks think you are) and wanted to show a instance of a ragequitter. You all can talk smack but let's see you fucking douche bags play better. LOL! Ya, I thought so.
November 22, 2009 at 8:47 PM
LOL @ the "SRS BUSNSS!" posters.
Any strategy that gets you a win is a good strategy.
If you can do that while taunting, more power to you.
If you ragequit you deserve to be up here.
November 26, 2009 at 8:50 PM
The commentary was unnecessary. This Chun Li was pretty bad, so keep the in-game taunting to the minimum. Heh =D
November 26, 2009 at 8:54 PM
Oh, and the in-game mail you sent was unnecessary too. I mean, what was that for?
Post a Comment